Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick
I think the big problem in the schools today can be traced to the societal acceptance of fornication among unmarried teens/young adults. If sex between unmarried persons, of whatever gender combination, is acceptable, then what is the objection to teacher-student sex, other than personal taste? If it’s okay for a 16-year-old girl to have sex with a 17-year-old boy, what *rational* objection can there be to her engaging in sex with a 30-year-old man?

Yes ... that follows a similar logic to "if it's okay to destroy the child growing in utero then why not after birth?". I'm waiting for some lawyer to use that argument to defend some youth who strangled or beat up a screaming newborn.

20 posted on 12/02/2007 3:29:49 PM PST by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: NYer
"if it's okay to destroy the child growing in utero then why not after birth?".

Very good comparison. Right is right, and wrong is wrong, no matter what the age of the persons involved.

Sex is right between married people who are prepared to be parents. In any other situation, wrong. Trying to split hairs among the versions of "wrong" isn't working.

26 posted on 12/02/2007 4:03:13 PM PST by Tax-chick (Every committee wants to take over the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson