Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54

You aren’t making sense. You said you were curious. I said you weren’t. You said “then why come bargin’ in?” So, I guess I am to take that because Topcat54 has absolutely no interest in actually listening to what dispensationalists have to say, that means they shouldn’t say it. Gee, that almost sounds like a democrat.


110 posted on 11/21/2007 9:18:20 AM PST by Blogger (Propheteuon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: Blogger
You aren’t making sense. You said you were curious. I said you weren’t. You said “then why come bargin’ in?” So, I guess I am to take that because Topcat54 has absolutely no interest in actually listening to what dispensationalists have to say, that means they shouldn’t say it. Gee, that almost sounds like a democrat.

Now that makes no sense. I was really curious why you would come around, post a bit, then complain about the tenor of the messages from the get-go, pout, and go marching home.

I have a great interest in what dispensationalists say when it makes sense from the Bible. But when they are pressed to actually defend their views from the Bible, or it is pointed out how one statement is inconsistent with the Bible, they tend to take it personally. I don’t get it.

As Michael Corleone said, "It's not personal. It's strictly business."

112 posted on 11/21/2007 9:26:06 AM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism -- an error of Biblical proportions.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson