I see..
.
Kill
Do not kill
Sorry, FRiend. I'm having trouble making sense of this.
Posted on 11/13/2007 5:34:21 PM PST by Semper
To call someone Satan is a serious matter. I posted a message allowing that I could be persuaded to change my views. How does your post do that?
Your article didn’t say anything about the election.
That’s a different matter, and so far as I know, few if any abortions are performed in the oval office. As a campaign issue it is simply not relevant.
Someday, maybe soon, roe will inevitably be overturned. Then it will be a fierce issue at the state level. But its relevance at the Presidential level is already pretty much over. Sure, one more judge might be nice, but we probably don’t even need that.
Psychotic departure from reality. The “principles of freedom and God’s omnipotence” called forth in support of killing one’s unborn child. Remarkable. I’m sure that’s just what the Founders had in mind. Sheesh.
I agree wholeheartedly.
I can think of several individuals for whom a "retroactive abortion" would have made the world a better place.
What you would really like to see is abortionists running rampant, funded with tax dollar no doubt. Stop the BS, Heinrich.
Yes. I do.
Agree, but that doesn't make it right. Who are we as mere humans to decide which people have worth and which don't. Isn't that playing God?
Knowing that the vast majority of “fetii” would survive outside the responsibilitress’ womb after 7 months of gestation, would you place any limits on abortion? If so what are those limits?
There’s no fine line at all. There is a bright clear line.
My child is my responsibility. My dog is my property.
I can shoot my dog.
I don't agree with that premise. There is only one very clear point in human development and that is birth. All other transitions are indeed arbitrary.
No. And using that language is what helps those who would take your freedom and degrade what this country was founded upon.
Have you not heard of Michael Vick?
If it were my responsibility, I would place huge limits on abortion. But that is not my responsibility, I am not the one carrying a potential human. I am not the one who must decide what is best for that potential human being and for the family (or lack thereof) into which it emerges.
In China the government decides for families how many children they can have - which now happens to be one. Matters of procreation are not the business of government.
If he had merely shot his dog he wouldn’t be in trouble.
I don't think that my mother's decision was what determined my existence - it was God's decision through her. She had two natural abortions before I was born (miscarriages) but if I had not been born from her, if it was God's will that I be born, it would have happened in other circumstances. Human beings are not more powerful than God.
I see..
.
Kill
Do not kill
Sorry, FRiend. I'm having trouble making sense of this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.