Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: newberger
Yes, that is a bit odd that the author puts "liturgical" in a different category than "active."

I think you're right that it reflects evangelicals' failure to recognize the importance of liturgical action.

Though bigotry is a bit strong a term to use for it. More likely, the author simply had little exposure to liturgy, and hence doesn't grasp its importance and spiritual value. I don't think it's fair to read anything sinister into it.

90 posted on 11/14/2007 1:20:59 PM PST by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
I don't think it's fair to read anything sinister into it.

I agree. You'll notice that I called it "unintentional".

They probably assume (wrongly) that we are just "going through the motions."

It's not sinister, its unfortunate.

93 posted on 11/14/2007 7:11:25 PM PST by newberger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson