Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS

I did not say that the guilty were guilty only of momentary weakness or that they should have been reassigned. But I am saying that some of the accused priests are not guilty. You apparently believe that every accused priest must be guilty simply because he was accused. Just as every man accused of rape must be guilty simply because he was accused.


38 posted on 11/11/2007 8:56:02 AM PST by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: steadfastconservative

I did not say that accusation is proof of guilt. I said that even many of those who were guilty, were gullty only of temporary lapses,not incorrigible, so they were sufficiently punished by being reassigned. We expect priests to be holy, but some are not. The greater point is that gays are applauded for their free spirits, when daily some kid in San Francisco is being bugged by a member of the gay community, with little protest from his “community.”


43 posted on 11/11/2007 11:39:23 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson