Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: wmfights
The council in Jerusalem reveals that decision making was done as a group and no one person made authoritative decisions on their own, a presbyterian system. ...... Until this happened a "bishop" was an elder who had no special authority other than to conduct the service. The development of "Metropolitans" is what really accelerated the process, until then the presbyters and bishops were viewed as equals. ......

Yes, this is the piece I didn't understand. Thanks very much.

31 posted on 11/07/2007 11:49:08 PM PST by Forest Keeper (It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Forest Keeper; wmfights

Wmfights’ is at best a very tendentious reading of Acts, and it is not consistent with Corinthians, where we see Paul defining a hierarchical system of authority. In Acts, we see St. James presiding, as bishop, over the meeting and dictating the canon regarding the admission of the Gentiles. I don’t understand where Wmfights finds his “no special authority other than to conduct the service”.


32 posted on 11/08/2007 10:46:31 AM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea-Luke14.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson