one should assume from the REPLACEMENTARIAN positions so preposterously pontificated hereon . . .
And "Division theology" is what you got.
Sorry, that post doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Evidently, the assertion is that taking Scripture at it's most logical face value . . . particularly comparing Scripture with Scripture for clarification, confirmation, . . . is somehow unacceptably DIVISIVE
vs
Mangling plain language all out of whack with all manner of jury-rigged rubber Bible postulations via mental gymnastics that would make a contortionist blush
is somehow
NOT
divisive?
LOL. ROTFLOL. GTTM. If that's the meaning of the cryptic post, I must concede it is a wonderously huge joke. LOL. It clearly wins in the joke dept.