Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: tabsternager

You mean

near

as in a thousand years is as a day

near?

Those verses present no challenging problem at all to my construction on Scriptural prophetic realities.

I’ve heard that rubber Bibles don’t clarify them, however.


89 posted on 10/24/2007 6:01:27 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Quix

Question: Would you think it would be misleading on God’s part if He said that something was not going to happen for a very long time when, in fact, it was imminent?

Conversely, would you think it would be misleading if God said something was at hand when, in reality, it wouldn’t happen for centuries to come?

If God were communicating to God, then I can see where you could have a valid argument using the verse you’ve used. But God was communicating to MAN. God knows how to communicate with man so that man can understand and God does not tarry. Therefore, when He tells man “soon,” He means “soon.”

If you can change the meaning of “near” (in Revelation) and yet NOT change the meaning of “distant future” (in Daniel), then you can make the Bible say just about anything you want it to.


105 posted on 10/24/2007 8:46:10 PM PDT by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson