Rome claims that the "keys to the kingsom" lay an exclusive, supreme rulership of the Church in Rome, which is completely contrary to the teaching consensus of the church fathers on the matter of Matthew 16:18-19.
Note that in context, Augustine, as I have noted, says that Peter symbolized the church, and does NOT say that the bishops of Rome do.
But they do
Only in the illusion set up by Roman Catholicism. The Greeks have never believed that, nor any other Christians.
and the evidence is exhaustive to that effect.
Wrong again, ask the Greeks.
If Rome had no primacy then, how do they have primacy today?
Rome doesn't have any primacy now, just as it never has.
What about all the Eastern Churches that recognize the primacy of Rome? Or does that sully your point, yet again?
and the evidence is exhaustive to that effect.
Wrong again, ask the Greeks.
Again, Clement/Corinth, et al. The Greek Orthodox Church is small potatoes compared to the enrollment of Roman Catholicism. Since "exhaustive" doesn't imply "totality", I don't understand your response.
Rome doesn't have any primacy now, just as it never has.
Then why are you so threatened?