Another fallacy.
So, if one refers to that which was transubstantiated from the bread, as opposed to that which was transubstantiated from the wine, it makes sense to refer to it according to its accidents.
Nonsense. Deception is not part of God's nature, and to create something that has the appearance [accidents] of one thing when in fact its substance is something else is deception and a lie. Name one occasion when God ever did such a thing or ever approved of man doing it. This whole doctrine of yours comes not from the God of the Bible but from Greek mysticism.
Indeed, even the Cardinals who professed transubstantiation over consubstantation referred to it as “bread” and “wine” as they said mass.
Only as such before the consecration, right? Just before they set the unleavened wafer on the lips of the congregant they say the words: "Jesus Christ -- body, blood, soul, and divinity".
And BTW just where and when did Jesus ever say those words. When did the magisterium start claiming that the bread was now more than just His body, but is now also His soul and divinity. Your magisterium keeps adding more leaven to that unleavened bread.
>> Nonsense. Deception is not part of God’s nature, and to create something that has the appearance [accidents] of one thing when in fact its substance is something else is deception and a lie. Name one occasion when God ever did such a thing or ever approved of man doing it. This whole doctrine of yours comes not from the God of the Bible but from Greek mysticism. <<
Anything you don’t agree with is a claim God is deceptive. You absolutely, prepostrously lost the argument that the ancient Christians didn’t believe that Eucharist was, in fact, always held to be the body of Christ, and so now you divert to other arguments. And as long as you can cling to anything to reject one argument, you justify yourself in rejecting all arguments.
You label it “Greek mysticism” as a means to reject it. Do you even know what Greek mysticism was?
>> Just before they set the unleavened wafer on the lips of the congregant they say the words: “Jesus Christ — body, blood, soul, and divinity”. <<
Lost an argument about it being the body of Christ, so now you’re moving on to another argument. Incidentally, although Catholics do believe those words to be true, they are not said during mass.
Another fallacy.
Another example of a Roman Catholic trying to have it both ways.
At one point when I commented that the bread and wine was not the actual, real, literal body and blood of Christ, dangus says the "accidents" are, now dangus says they are the real, actual, body and blood. But then, Roman Catholicism is full of contradictions.