[Campion]

I agree, the early church fathers held the same interpretation of Matthew 16:18 as Protestants

You have two whole examples. I have a book here on my lap ("Jesus, Peter, and the Keys", by Butler, Dahlgren, and Hess) with 64 pages of counterexamples between pages 215 and 279.

It will take me time just to cherry-pick some good ones to post.

[Missey_Lucy_Goosey]

You have two whole examples. I have a book here on my lap ("Jesus, Peter, and the Keys"...

I'm familiar with the misrepresentations in that book.

Post them when you want and I'll respond to demonstrate how the authors take the citations they present out of context, and totally misrepresent, especially the term they point out so much, being "the chair of Peter".

[Missey_Lucy_Goosey]

Then maybe we can have a discussion on Rome's new definition of "tradition" from the Vincentian Principle, quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum est, that Rome cited at the Council of Trent to it's new version of "viva voce", or whatever Rome says it is.

[Missey_Lucy_Goosey]

You have two whole examples.

Those two were just for starters, there are many, many more.

So much for "tradition" being the "unanimous consent of the fathers", that Rome cited at Trent, huh?