Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: stripes1776

By geometric, I mean it was expressed in geometric terms, as was Ptolemy’s, or any scientist for still another hundred years after Galileo until modern annaliyical tools were developed. But don’t despise induction: this is really the approach that St. Thomas did when he was trying to “prove” the existence of God.


120 posted on 10/16/2007 4:01:41 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
By geometric, I mean it was expressed in geometric terms, as was Ptolemy’s, or any scientist for still another hundred years after Galileo until modern annaliyical tools were developed. But don’t despise induction: this is really the approach that St. Thomas did when he was trying to “prove” the existence of God

You have misinterpreted. I didn't say anything about despising inductive reasoning, only that inductive reasoning is not a proof except under very limited conditions, namely complete enumeration. There are never proofs in science.

You used the word "proof". It's not a proof.

121 posted on 10/16/2007 4:41:04 PM PDT by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson