You really think that this is comparable???
Perhaps you should revisit exactly, what Luther's criticisms with the then corrupt Catholic Church actually were.
No one, none of us, is beyond correction, beyond reproof.
Do you doubt that? If so, I suspect that is because of the long practiced abuse of power still perpetuated unto this day, by religious *authorities* who claim that authority rests with themselves...as opposed to resting in the Word, and in Christ, and also living in each and every follower of Him, through the power of the Holy Ghost.
The apostle Peter, was at one point himself corrected by the brethren...even though it was first he himself [amongst the then Apostles] that was [supernaturally] given the doctrine that;
Christ's sacrifice, was for all of humanity.
If that were not true, there would be no Catholic Church, at all!!! Salvation would be for the Jews, alone.
Comparing this modern "it's ok to be a homo" heresy, with Luther's condemnations of what was then, certain errors of the Roman Catholic leadership, is gross error, on your part!
Knock it off!
Please demonstrate a single OFFICIAL Church policy any time in history as being "corrupt." (P.S. The fact that your Protestant denomination disagrees with something DOES NOT make it corrupt).
Comparing this modern "it's ok to be a homo" heresy, with Luther's condemnations of what was then, certain errors of the Roman Catholic leadership, is gross error, on your part!
Of Luther's 95 Theses, can you please demonstrate for us a single error that was an ACTUAL official practice of the Church.
Knock it off!
Luther didn't like certain Biblical truths so he removed them from scripture. This man thinks homosexuals should be married, women should be ordained, etc., so he pretends it's okay. Not a lot of difference.