[xzins]

I am not saying that.

I’m saying that writings of the Apostolic Eyewitnesses who associated with Jesus in the Palestine of roughly 0-35 AD would be legitimate scripture.

Last I checked my New Testament, Joseph’s last name was not Smith.

[fproy2222]

you said, and i am copying and pasting your words;;

I would certainly add an absolutely proven writing of one of the apostles to the bible. Others have argued with me over that one, but I am subject to the Apostles by instruction of Jesus Christ.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

are you now saying you did not say it?

---

you also said;;;;;;;;

I’m saying that writings of the Apostolic Eyewitnesses who associated with Jesus in the Palestine of roughly 0-35 AD would be legitimate scripture

++++++++++++++++

And what about the eyewitness who knew Marry and the Roman solider who fathered Jesus. He lived during the time of Christ and wrote just after His death.

To you, why is his first hand testimony not as true as those you choose to believe.