You are a deceiver (that’s a nicer way to call you a liar for falsely claiming I say there are no more prophets)
In your Post
#568 you said, and I quote:
The Book of Hebrews was written to Jews who were familiar with prophets and priests of Judaism. The author’s purpose becomes clear very quickly because the writer contrasts the past method by which God spoke to the Hebrews --via prophets-- with the new way He speaks to us via His Son.
You further state:
Mormonism has sought to reestablish the Judaism system of ‘law and prophets’ … which Jesus replaced by fulfilling them and has thus become our Great High Priest and speaks directly to us via His Word such that we are not now to establish ‘different’ or ’new’ doctrine and covenants via ‘prophets‘ calling themselves messengers of God:
Your words mean things, if you did not mean to say there were no more prophets, then correct the record here for that is what I heard you say. I am as you know a very literal person. I take words to mean what they are by a dictionary definition and often will link in my posts to the dictionary, just so people will know exactly what I mean by the words I am using. If you are using alternate meanings for words, please help out the rest of us on FR by linking to definitions so that we can understand you and will then not have our characters impugned by being called liars by you.
... I noted that personal prophecy (uttered by prophets, whiner) is still in effect as with the prophecies to Paul regarding the sufferings he would endure, but a prophet to lead the people is an insult to the One whom you ought to have leading you then you wouldn’t lie and deceiver and try to create false attributions to people.
It's not a false attribution, I have just linked to where you have said it.
Jim, do we not on this forum have a rule against name calling? (whiner is a name), MHGinTN for months has responded to posts to me and several other Mormons on threads about our church without placing us in the "TO" line of his posts. I had thought this was also a rule on this forum.
I appologise for posting to you, I know you are a busy man, and I feel like an ungrateful guest in your house for complaining, but MHGinTN brought you in as an attempt to intimidate me (my opinion), thus I must respond and include you in the discussion.
I will ask straight out. Does MHGinTN have to follow the same rules of decorum the rest of us FReepers are required to obey or not?
And you wonder why I do not consider you to put your name in the ‘to’ line!
Because you are disrespectful of this forum?
Because you think you are somehow special?
Because you keep getting your behind handed to you in gospel discussions?
I could come up with more reasons, but I am sure you will now tell me why.
You Mormon Apologists are getting such good exposure for the dissemblers you are. Nice work for poor Mitt. I doubt you’ll get another acknowledgement this year so enjoy this one, deceiver. ... And I won’t respond to your other FR IDs either.
Ah, you have decided that you can now determine that I have multiple FR ID's (which you have asked me before and I told you that I only have one.)
Jim, In this paragraph, I have been called a deceiver, been accused of having more than one FR account (which I do not), and been accused of supporting Mitt romeny for President, when MHGinTN should know that I support Fred Thompson (but will vote for anyone opposing Hillary).
Jim, please have someone investigate this, if I am found to have more than one ID, please remove me from this forum for I will have broken the rules and do not belong here. Similarly, please investigate MHGinTN similarly just to keep things fair. I really hate to have to ask you to do anything on this, and would not have if MHGinTN had not pinged you in a post to me where he impugns my character and behavior on FR. I am also going to ping in an Admin Moderator in hopes that they can take care of this without bothering you.
Jim, thank you for your time and for this forum.