[Claud]

But it sounds like a makeweight to me. I've never heard of anyone using it (and WHY would anybody use it, if it's just like the ordinary Catholic version?).

There are probably some differences...I'm not well versed in the various editions of the BCP to pick those out, maybe I can take a look when I get home tonight. I went looking for the text online but couldn't find it...which shows how well it is regarded! ;)

Besides -- it can just be ignored the way "Rite I" is ignored in almost every ECUSA parish.

Exactly.

[Huber]

If someone were to post the “rite I” version of AU here, we could have a “layman’s” (and “laywoman’s”) on line collaborative workshop (just for fun.)