Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
Yes, and I think this is also the reason St. Matthew put in the genealogy.

If all of the women in the geneology, including Mary were "good trees" already, then your Luke reference does not support the need for the Immaculate Conception.
222 posted on 09/13/2007 12:50:49 AM PDT by armydoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies ]


To: armydoc
does not support the need for the Immaculate Conception.

We have two levels of goodness here: the righteous yet afflicted with original sin stock producing what would have been a righteous yet afflicted with original sin Mary, and the Divine Goodness that gives birth to man Jesus. If the Father had made Jesus out of clay like Adam, there would be no questioon of how, -- but it pleased the Father to use a human mother. She is then both a culmination of the human Jewish stock, and a tabernacle of the Divine Word. This supports the immaculacy of Mary; it is logical that the immaculacy was imparted onto her at her conception.

So, "eating His flesh and drinking His blood" can mean something other than the physical acts of eating and drinking

Speculate you. The context of John 6 is firmly against any symbolic interpretation of the Eucharist. The Good Thief episode merely explains that one should "eat the flesh of the Son of Man" if he is able to do so, and the Good Thief was not.

227 posted on 09/13/2007 1:07:00 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson