That you are clueless regarding why God as a man would not be married to one or more women, thus becoming ‘one flesh’ with one or more ‘adamic nature’ humans (the wives) says a lot about your spiritual state as a Mormon rather than a Christian. Am I saying you are not a Christian? Of course not, but I am saying if you are a Christian you are far off from a close relationship with The Lord to edify/transform your mind since you would not instantly recognize why Jesus would not be joined to ‘other flesh’ during his sojourn as God with us.
Well, since you claim it is something we should be able to ‘instantly recognize’ you ought to be able to actually express why you think Christ could not have possibly been married instead of just casting stones at us for asking what would be wrong if he was.
Go ahead, I’m all ears.
Thanks for your post. Clueless I might be about many things, but your mention of " ‘adamic nature’ humans (the wives)" gives me a clue about your thinking.
Apparently, you believe that Jesus Christ is one Person having two distinct natures, one Divine and one human. (Please correct me if I am wrong.) Hence it is often stated that Jesus is both fully God and fully man. I gather that this is something of a paradox for traditional Christians, who view the Divine and the human as completely different from each other. I am guessing that you consider sexuality as belonging wholly to the human nature, and incompatible with the God nature.
Am I right thus far?