I guess it depends if your teenagers’ work can be published regularly in established media outlets—both online and print.
By the way, Marsh, the Pope freed the Mass. I guess you’ll have to change your tune now. It will will really be interesting when the SSPX excommunications are lifted.
You and Black Elk and other might have kiniption fits. At the most, you won’t have much to write about anymore...
Oh yeah.......we're heartbroken.
Click on my name and "Find in Forum" and see how much I've written recently. There's plenty to write about and none of it involves SSPX. I hope it stays that way. Most of my contributions to this forum involve apologetics with non-Catholics, an area from which you are conspicuously absent.
Your only appearances around here are for the purposes of posting your own articles, which are invariably about one and only one subject; SSPX. That's pretty lame, if you don't mind me saying so.
Who is it that's obsessed, again?
I'm entirely delighted about the recent motu proprio and will happily welcome all SSPXers with open arms should the excommunications be lifted and they cease their virulent criticisms of the Pope. The former (Latin Mass) was never an issue for me but the latter (trashing the Pope) was and still is. Ironically, it will be your one and only source of journalistic material which will evaporate, not mine:-)
By the way, Tax-chick was correct. This is a vanity. You also qualify for the "shameless self-promotion" award for your constant hawking of your own pieces around here. It's clear you have a desperate need to be considered a contributor of gravitas by your Freeper peers on the SSPX issue. So we get this piece about "Fr. Newman". Forgive me, but I've never heard of him. I think you'll find there's little heat or mileage in this topic. The whole piece reads like you're trying to stir up a controversy.
*Shrug*.......sorry to disappoint you.
“Conniption.”
It remains to be seen what SSPX members will do.
But since I haven’t seen any of them running to the 1962 Rite Mass offered in Milwaukee (regularly, since ~1986,) I suspect that they’re not too interested in unity.
The Church can open the door.
But the Church cannot drag people in...
BTW, were you fired by the Wanderer for all those (so far) inaccurate presumptions that B-XVI would be restoring the SSPX excommunicated schismatics any day now endlessly repeated in your writings over a period of a couple of years???? If even the Remnant some day bids you farewell, will you then turn to the SSPX agitprop organ The Angelus????
On behalf of the grammar police, that is "conniption" and not kinniption." You are a somewhat professional writer and spell-check should be your friend.
Additionally, the opponents of SSPX here are those who obey papal authority (as in Ecclesia Dei of JP II). The SSPX love slaves are the ones who yearn for such insolent antiCatholic trash as Fellay, Williamson and especially de Mallerais and have no problem with gross insolence, insubordination and grand theft ecclesiastical as are the hallmarks of the taste-offended schismatic excommunicati.
Finally, if you reference me, have the guts to ping me and not to hide behind the barn scribbling anti-Catholic graffiti. Such pinging is common courtesy. AND Tax-chick's newborns have more of a grasp of Catholicism than you do.