[topcat54]

The "ages" that he was speaking of when he chose to use the word "aion" again and again and again rather than another word or words.

Yes, but how he used it is more important than that he used it. That is where your analysis is lacking.

You seem to be trying to make a point by raw assertion. We're still waiting for the exegesis that supports your theory.

And your evidence for that is what???? ---- the clear blue sky overhead.

I don't need to prove anything. The burden is on you to show how Paulk's use of "aeon" is the same as the modern interpretation of "dispensation". All you have done so far is proof by insisting.

[Uncle Chip]

You seem to be trying to make a point by raw assertion. We're still waiting for the exegesis that supports your theory.

Who is "We"???