To: Petronski
What part of the following words that I posted are untrue:
"...we possess no precise information regarding the details of his Roman sojourn"
?????????
129 posted on
08/01/2007 12:38:29 PM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Uncle Chip; Petronski
As Petronski has tried to tell you numerous times, you posted those words out of context to bolster your point that....and I am quoting you verbatim now:
even Catholic scholars admit that there is no evidence for Peter's mythical sojourn to Rome.
THAT's the part that's untrue--the "even Catholic scholars" bit. The very Catholic scholars you quoted said that we possess no precise DETAILS of the sojourn, but the evidence is indisputable that he was there.
130 posted on
08/01/2007 1:03:13 PM PDT by
Claud
To: Uncle Chip
It's a half-truth by omission...i.e., a lie. You pulled a quote out of context and stood it on its own to contort the information conveyed by the original speaker.
That's a lie.
134 posted on
08/01/2007 1:37:00 PM PDT by
Petronski
(imwithfred.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson