I actually studied this when I was researching my book.
So, according to you, a recollection by Oliver Huntingdon of a statement allegedly given by Joseph Smith FORTY years earlier, corroborated by no other contemporary (or later) witness, in a place and time Joseph Smith was NOT known to be; is OFFICIAL MORMON DOCTRINE - regardless of the fact NO Mormon I know believes it????
What are you smoking???
As for Galatians saying the Book of Mormon is from Satan, well, [lol!] now I know the level of your hermeneutics ...
You know, I can play this “false witness” game just as well with your own religion, so knock it off.
“So, according to you, a recollection by Oliver Huntingdon of a statement allegedly given by Joseph Smith FORTY years earlier, corroborated by no other contemporary (or later) witness, in a place and time Joseph Smith was NOT known to be; is OFFICIAL MORMON DOCTRINE - regardless of the fact NO Mormon I know believes it????”
No, you misunderstand. It isn’t official doctrine. It shows
he is a kook.
“As for Galatians saying the Book of Mormon is from Satan,”
I do not believe I said that Edward.
Kooks make statements like that. In this case, you have
many kooks who have said such things - who mormonism
treats as prophets and lds leaders. It is simply more
evidence of the quality of individual mormons must affirm
as a prophet in order to get a temple recommendation - or
not spend eternity in the presence of God.
ampu