Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50

So are you saying that a working definition of Christian would be the acceptance of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the foundation of belief, with the rest of Scripture supporting rather than redefining it?


7,587 posted on 09/29/2007 8:57:04 AM PDT by MarkBsnr (V. Angelus Domini nuntiavit Mariae. R. Et concepit de Spiritu Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7563 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr
So are you saying that a working definition of Christian would be the acceptance of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the foundation of belief, with the rest of Scripture supporting rather than redefining it?

A scriptural definition—Yes. Our theology must be in concert with the Gospels. A theology based on the Gospels will correctly interpret the rest. The Gospels represent the God's full revelation to man. Without the Gospels, there is no Christianity. Te rest of the scriptures become meaningless.

There is a reason why only the Gospels are on the altar. There is a reason why everyone stands when only when the Gospels are read (at least in TLM), or why only clergy read form the Gospels.

7,612 posted on 09/29/2007 11:50:25 AM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7587 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson