Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: fortheDeclaration
Unbelievable. Someone who makes a statement like this has never cracked open the bible, or understood any it, if he has. God loved them so much that He gave His only Son to die for their sins.

Amen.

Well, once again those who disagree with the Protestant Wrecking Crew could only do so because they don't understand or haven't read Scripture.

LONG before I even THOUGHT of being Catholic it was a commonplace that God was "without parts or passions". Consequently those parts of the Scripture which you all cheerfully take as justification for scornfully proclaiming that we are either ignorant or stupid were understood as a moving effort to portray as best as it could be portrayed in human language what the Divine ACTION of Love is like.

By this reckoning, true Love is what God IS (and God chooses to be what He is), and what we call love is a kind of simulacrum of true love or a projection on a dull and torn screen of the Divine Love. Consequently, on a day to day basis, Love and pity and whatnot are things we suffer, things that happen to us. Only over time do we learn that real Love and Pity and the rest are actions and acts of will.

That God the Son of God suffers and dies is by the same sort of reckoning part of the incomprehensible mystery of the Incarnation. One thing we can say with some confidence is that God didn't send his only begotten Son because he FELT like it. He CHOSE, and chose freely, to do so.

But maybe it's just incomprehensible to us stupid Catholics, since those who have γνωσις, uh, I mean knowledge, know the nature of God so well that they can confidently mock those with whom they disagree.

I feel so, oh, I don't know, deflated ... not puffed up anyway. I leave that to those with γνωσισ.

You don't think it might just be possible that the word passion is being used in different ways here? If you'll excuse my ignorance in suggesting it....

5,948 posted on 09/11/2007 6:13:43 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5880 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg
I do not think that the reply I say 'amen' to was addressed to the Roman Catholics.

They, were I believe, addressed to someone of the Greek Orthodox faith.

I have never thought that the Roman Catholics had any problem with ascribing passions to God.

6,013 posted on 09/11/2007 10:53:37 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5948 | View Replies ]

To: Mad Dawg
By this reckoning, true Love is what God IS (and God chooses to be what He is),

God does not choose to be what He is, He is what He is because He is God.

Thus, God doesn't choose to be Love, God is Love.

What God does choose to do is to share His Love with sinful creatures who don't deserve it.

That is what John 3:16 is speaking of.

6,015 posted on 09/11/2007 11:00:49 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5948 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson