You replied: "To the contrary, dear adiaireton8, I do know who is most accurately teaching the whole of the Apostles' doctrine and have repeatedly testified that the "who" is none other than the Holy Spirit Himself."
Notice how your "To the contrary" does not address my statement. My statement is about which humans are most accurately teaching Apostolic doctrine. Your response is about the the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit is not a human being. Therefore, your "To the contrary" is a red herring, i.e. it is not a refutation of my statement, because it changes the subject.
If you don't know which humans/denomination most accurately teaches the Apostolic doctrine, then why not just say so, instead of playing games by changing the subject and acting as though it refutes my statement?
-A8
I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness [come] by the law, then Christ is dead in vain. - Galatians 2:20-21