[xzins]

That means that at birth there’s no way to change the results.

God thinks of shaping pot A and says to Himself based on His knowledge, “This one is going to end up in the trash.” Then He makes it, and it ends up in the trash.

God thinks of shaping pot B and says to Himself based on His knowledge, “This one is going to end up on the shelf.” Then He makes it, and it ends up on the shelf.

God PLANS the shape of pot A and says to Himself, “This one is going to end up in the trash.” Then He makes it, and it ends up in the trash.

God PLANS the shape of pot B and says to Himself, “This one is going to end up on the shelf.” Then He makes it, and it ends up on the shelf.

No difference between foreknowing and planning in terms of end results.....which God knows ahead of time.

[D-fendr]

That means that at birth there’s no way to change the results.

Nope. That means that if the results change, they're foreknown.

God doesn't make trash. Especially trash in His image.

[Petronski]

No difference between foreknowing and planning in terms of end results...

Clearly either you and/or Calvin were very poor logicians.

[D-fendr]

No difference between foreknowing and planning in terms of end results.....which God knows ahead of time.

I would put it this way in the context of our discussion: man having free will does not necessarily mean God cannot have a plan.

Your initial point, however, was that God's omniscience/omnipotence logically negated man's having free will. I don't believe you've proved this statement.