We can draw paralleles with unrelated things. It's a straw man. To claim what the Bible we read is pristine is a lie because we have evidence to prove it. You are more than welcome to pull your head out of the sand and look for it. I have mentioned dozens of facts about the Bible that show that human hands left singificant fingerprints on the scriptures, all of which amount to corruption.
Then stop arguing from scripture. Don't quote any scripture to support your theology.
Now tell me, without resorting to scripture, why your church's beliefs have any validity whatsoever.
Does the EO recommend the King James (1611) english version of the bible for those that do not read Greek? Is the KJV also riddled with errors in your opinion?
You seem obsessed to have everyone acknowledge your scholarship, offering broad assertions such as, “[the] Bible ... show(s) that human hands left singificant fingerprints on the scriptures, all of which amount to corruption.” Let us look at that assertion from God’s perspective. Yes, men have corrupted the written directions dictated (in a manner of speaking), the most gross being the Masoretic texts where Jews decided to edit out anything that one might construe as referring to Rabbi Jesus. But that begs the question of how could men defeat God’s sovereign plans? Is it so easy to edit out what God actually is instructing with the scriptures? You would answer that with a strong affirmative as evidenced by your many references to corruption and inferences that the texts cannot be trusted to do that which God intends. I would offer in reply that you do not actually understand what it is that God does with His words in the believer and what it is that He has designed into the Word such that even the corrupting you claim has not diminished the utility to which God directs His Word. You would make a good heretic because you consider your own counsel to be superior to anything you don’t comprehend in God’s economy.