Based on the fact that the OT calls angels "Sons of God." Your disagreement is based on what? Mine is that angels have no bodies and cannot mate with women...the author of that passage was eating mushrooms, or attended some New Age conference, or both.
How does reincarnation play out in this interpretation of Scripture?
This has turned out to be one heretical forum after all. Now we are going into reincarnation?
Isn’t it a Protestant Principle of some kind that scripture is capable of proper interpretation by a common reading - or something like that? Basically that there isn’t authority outside sola scriptura necessary to get the proper meaning.
Someone correct me if I’ve mistated this position.
In any case, isn’t this discussion a disproof of that principle?