To: betty boop; RightWhale; Alamo-Girl; hosepipe
Thanks betty boop. I understood what he said. Just because a bunch of people talk about something as an “object” of their conversation doesn’t mean there is such an object. So, it is just words unattached to anything real. In other words, shooting the breeze in common language.
2,342 posted on
08/13/2007 10:46:33 AM PDT by
kosta50
(Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
To: kosta50
Just because a bunch of people talk about something as an “object” of their conversation doesn’t mean there is such an object. So, it is just words unattached to anything real. Certainly I don't disagree with you on that, kosta50!
2,343 posted on
08/13/2007 10:48:26 AM PDT by
betty boop
("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein)
To: kosta50
I understood what he said. Saying you do doesn't mean you do.
2,344 posted on
08/13/2007 10:49:43 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: kosta50
doesn’t mean there is such an object. So, it is just words unattached to anything real. Got a teensy problem here. It also doesn't mean there isn't. Words are signs of concepts. We know we can't know objectively what is real, only if it is objective.
2,351 posted on
08/13/2007 11:10:53 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson