Yes, I saw that. The point I was making that the implication of "kosta50's" post to me, when he misread what I actually said, when he assumed that I called the iconoclastic council an "ecumenical council", when in fact I did not, was that I was a heretic, as all heretics call the iconoclastic council an ecumenical council. While "kosta50" did not directly call me a heretic, it was a backdoor accusation by implication.
The point is, I find "kosta50's" being offended a shade on the hypocritical side after heavily implying I was a heretic.
I am not offended. The FR rules against personal attacks are clear and for a good reason. The purpose of my involving the RM was to reinforce the rules.
Irishtenor, had I been offended I would have forgiven you without an apology. But your good will gesture is valued nonetheless.
If it is allowed to say that Orthodoxy is idolatrous then by extension all Orthodox are idolators. The implication is there but unless someone says to me "You are an idolator" it is not an ad hominem. I think you are building straw men, Missey_Lucy_Goosey.
Open threads are not ecumenical. Posters on open threads should expect their confession to be challenged, ridiculed or whatever. If the poster cannot handle that type of "town square" debate, he should stay with the closed threads (devotionals, caucuses and prayer threads) which are "safe harbor."
I can intercede to keep posters from "making it personal" but there is nothing I can do to keep a poster from "taking it personally."
Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.