Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: William Terrell
Note, this is a hypothetical. If you use that as an reason to avoid, then it has to be presumed that you would think it would be, because, considering your position, if you thought it wasn't you would say so and gave reasons.

That is one of the most convoluted sentences I ever have read!

What a mind you have!

So, if I don't answer a hypothetical question it is because I believe it is not really a hypothetical question, but actually factual?

How about if I don't answer it because it is a ridiculous hypothetical question?

With 'thinking' like that no wonder you are so confused!

772 posted on 09/13/2007 10:25:35 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies ]


To: fortheDeclaration
If you asked me a hypothetical question like this, I would consider it and answer it if such a condition really existed.
Convoluted or not, you know what I said.

774 posted on 09/14/2007 6:29:55 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 772 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson