Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: lightman; AnAmericanMother; sionnsar; Huber; aberaussie; kosta50; FormerLib
Correction: The issue of the priestess-muslim IS settled. Apparently, she was ordained by a bishop of Rhode Island. Thus, under the arcane rules of the ECUSA, even though she serves under the bishop of Washington state, the bishop of Rhode Island has authority to discipline her. You Anglicans please correct me if I am wrong.

However, the issue of "Gay" Bradley Schmeling is NOT settled!!!!

Nor is the issue of the alledged "compatibility" of islam and Christianity realy settled, among Episcopalians and Lutherans. My own (revisionist) ELCA pastor once preached a sermon, in which he cited one of his muslim friends. That "friend" took one of the passages of the Qu'ran that states that islam is the only path to Paradise, and translated "islam" as "this submission". According to that translation, a Christian may attain to Paradise if he/she "submits" to God. That sounds like a transparent case of Al Taqqia to me!!!!

As the result of that sermon, one of our members, a theologically unsophisticated woman, left our congregation and joined the only Wisconsin Synod Lutheran church in our entire region. Ironically, the more theologically learned orthodox members of our congregation, including yours truly, just grumbled to each other and stayed put.

I think that Jesus said something about the simple "getting it" faster than the supposedly learned, which applies in at least some cases, including this one. But most of us "learned" orthodox folks didn't know where else to go, and most still don't.

42 posted on 07/08/2007 5:09:02 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Honorary Serb
It is not correct that a priest who is ordained by a particular bishop remains subject to that bishop forever.

In this case, the priestess is still "canonically resident" in Rhode Island. That simply means that her clerical letters remain in that diocese. The relevant canon is as follows:

Of Letters Dimissory

Sec. 4. (a) A Priest desiring to become canonically resident within a Diocese shall present to the Ecclesiastical Authority a testimonial from the Ecclesiastical Authority of the Diocese of current canonical residence, which testimonial shall be given by the Ecclesiastical Authority to the applicant, and a duplicate thereof may be sent to the Ecclesiastical Authority of the Diocese to which transfer is proposed. The testimonial shall be accompanied by a statement of the record of payments to The Church Pension Fund by or on behalf of the Priest concerned and shall be in the following words:

I hereby certify that A.B., who has signified to me the desire to be transferred to the Ecclesiastical Authority of _____, is a Priest of in good standing, and has not, so far as I know or believe, been justly liable to evil report, for error in religion or for viciousness of life, for the last three years. (Date) (Signed)

(b) Such a testimonial shall be called Letters Dimissory. If the Ecclesiastical Authority accepts the Letters Dimissory, the canonical residence of the Priest transferred shall date from such acceptance, and prompt notice of acceptance shall be given to the applicant and to the Ecclesiastical Authority issuing the Letters Dimissory.

(c) Letters Dimissory not presented within six months of their date of receipt by the applicant shall become void.

(d) If a Priest has been called to a Cure in a congregation in another Diocese, the Priest shall present Letters Dimissory. The Ecclesiastical Authority of the Diocese shall accept Letters Dimissory within three months of their receipt unless the Bishop or Standing Committee has received credible information concerning the character or behavior of the Priest concerned which would form grounds for canonical inquiry and presentment. In such a case, the Ecclesiastical Authority shall notify the Ecclesiastical Authority of the Diocese in which the Priest is canonically resident and need not accept the Letters Dimissory unless and until the Priest shall be exculpated. The Ecclesiastical Authority shall not refuse to accept Letters Dimissory based on the applicant's race, color, ethnic origin, sex, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, disabilities, or age.

Apparently this priestess violated the Canons by failing to apply for letters dimissory when she took a position in Washington State. But having failed to do so, she is still under the jurisdiction of the Bishopess of R.I.

43 posted on 07/08/2007 6:04:14 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson