Replies

To: MHGinTN; sevenbak; Greg F; Elsie; Enosh; aMorePerfectUnion; JRochelle; greyfoxx39; nowandlater; ...

I can't believe this has degenerated into a debate over the meaning of the word "at" or "in" what is this, Bill Clinton's deposition?

Next thing you know, one of you will start saying "I don't recall" to everything (Hillarys Grand Jury appearance) and we'll have a full set.

Don't you guys know how ridiculous it is to argue a religion is false because of the word at?

You guys are funny, thanks for making us look good with this one, oh, please keep arguing it for as long as you can keep a straight face.

1,195 posted on 07/15/2007 3:18:14 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")

LOL Predictably, condescension and ridicule from the professional apologist corner. ... 'a little echo, echo ...'

1,196 posted on 07/15/2007 3:34:18 PM PDT by MHGinTN (You've had life support. Promote life support for those in the womb.)

These guys have no clue. What would someone 480 years away from any contact from the old world describe these events? It is actually more proof that the Book of Mormon is an account from the people in the Americas.

1,198 posted on 07/15/2007 4:30:03 PM PDT by nowandlater (Ron Paul....doing the job Americans, er, McCain won't, er, can't do--Ron has more COH LOL!)

If this is turning into a Bill Clinton deposition, it is because you are trying to redefine the word ‘at.’

Words mean things.

Smith made a simple mistake. Why doesn’t your church just fix it like the thousands of other little mistakes that have been fixed in the BOM?

You claim your Prophet was not perfect. Yet you will deny a clear imperfection!

1,227 posted on 07/16/2007 7:28:36 AM PDT by JRochelle (Vacant Lott needs to be evicted from the Senate.)