To: DelphiUser
Well, you appear to be the only apologist that wishes to enter into discussion of what I understand to be published Mormon doctrine, instead of huffily pronouncing that the non Mormon Gentiles don’t understand anything about the faith and leaving the discussion.
And I do appreciate that.
1,020 posted on
07/13/2007 5:17:00 AM PDT by
MarkBsnr
(V. Angelus Domini nuntiavit Mariae. R. Et concepit de Spiritu Sancto.)
To: MarkBsnr
Well, you appear to be the only apologist that wishes to enter into discussion of what I understand to be published Mormon doctrine, instead of huffily pronouncing that the non Mormon Gentiles dont understand anything about the faith and leaving the discussion.
Thank you.
I feel the same way about being called an "Apologist" as others do about being called anti Mormon, I have nothing to apologize for, my faith is a good thing. However, i accept it because it is the term that is in use, as Anti-Mormons should accept the accurate, but unflattering label that is in use for their position /rant
For some fun, click on my name and check out my page here at FR, I have done some research on the Trinity and the First Council at Nice from the Mormon perspective. it might be illustrative, then again, it might just be boring to you. (YMMV)
1,040 posted on
07/13/2007 7:49:55 AM PDT by
DelphiUser
("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
To: MarkBsnr
I’ll try to read through the post and reply. But be warned, it may be stuff I’ve already responded to many times, so I will ping you.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson