Part of the problem here is that the view you attribute to those of us with our roots in the Reformation is that what is described here might be more accurately referred to as “solo” scriptura and not “sola” scriptura. There is a difference.
That is the first time I've ever heard of "Solo Scriptura." My working definition of "sola scriptura" is "the Bible as the only rule of faith and practice." Can you please highlight (a) if I'm wrong in my working definition and (b) what the differences are between "Sola Scriptura" and "Solo Scriptura?" (That is if you weren't simply employing a sense of humor that is far too sophisticated for my plebian mind ;) )