[Petronski]

Ah, Irving’s Law, the bogus and dishonorable attempt to shelter anti-Catholic hate speech from counter-criticism.

[Alex Murphy]

Ah, Irving’s Law, the bogus and dishonorable attempt to shelter anti-Catholic hate speech from counter-criticism.

In other words, the truthfulness or accuracy of one's accusations should never be questioned - it's only the seriousness of the charge that matters here.

Thank you for your testimony, Ms. Hill. You may be seated.

[Quix]

Ahhhhhh . . .

But someone with seemingly broken mirrors

seems to equate

DISAGREEMENT

with

hate speech.

I don’t buy into that construction on reality in the slightest.

[Quix]

BTW,

DISAGREEMENT with Roman doctrine, dogma, positions, rituals, constructions on reality . . .

is also

NOT equal

to attacking RC’s as individuals or collections of individuals.

Nor is even attacking RC doctrine, dogma, positions, rituals, constructions on reality

equal to

attacking RC’s as individuals or collections of individuals nor even the whole of the RC edifice.

Evidently for SOME of us, it is possible to selectively disagree with and attack those specific things which we find UNBiblical, UNChrist-like, UNChristian.

Of course, folks who find comfort in blackwashing, overgeneralizing, spiteful all encompassing generalizations . . . are quite inclined, it seems, to attack Proties with venom and claws quite evident. Evidently THAT is a kosher RC doctrine AND practice.