[HarleyD]

I believe that radiation and it’s effects can be measured and viewed repeatedly, by different people, with the same results.

Not necessarily. You have people who 1) believe in radiation and its effect, 2) understand about radiation but don't care, 3) understand and wish to use it for their own devices, and 4) don't believe in it. Even our federal government will deny claims to cancer-ridden people who have been exposed to radiation leaks simply on the grounds that there is no direct evidence that radiation caused their illness. If radiation's effects were so obvious, there shouldn't be any disagreements.

If there is no logic or reason available, then what makes anyones’s belief, any more or less valid than anothers?

Who's argument is more logical or reasonable; the person who has been exposed to radiation and is dying from cancer or the lawyers with their statistical data fighting claims? Would you use that same argument with someone dying of cancer; that the lawyers arguments are just as valid as the cancer patient? Is it really true?

There is logic and reason available. Even the cancer patient with 20 malignant tumors on his kidneys knows the source even if he can't prove it. It just a matter of what he knows to be true based upon what has been revealed to him.

I believe God speaks to each individual as He sees fit.

Perhaps He's speaking to you now.

[stuartcr]

You said you would never convince me of the existence existence of hell with logic or reason. We’re not really talking about cancer or lawyers.

Yes, I believe God is talking to all of us, all the time...that is why we do what we do...that is how He created us.