Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Looked at the Early Church and There Wasn't a Baptist in Sight [Ken Hensley]
Los Angeles Lay Catholic Mission ^ | 1997 | Lesley Payne

Posted on 06/03/2007 6:11:12 PM PDT by Titanites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: alpha-8-25-02
I still can't make much sense of this chart.

What's the vertical dimension signify?

3. The horizontal lines at the bottom have between them the nicknames given to Baptists during the passing years and ages -- Novations, Montanists, Paulicians and Waldenses.

I don't at this instant know anything about the Novations or Paulicians. The Waldensians are OK, far as I know.

The Montanists you don't want in your pedigree. Ditto the Albigenisans and Cathars, who you don't mention, though they are on the chart. And who are these "Puritans" in the 4th century.

I notice they don't mention Munster.

81 posted on 06/04/2007 5:49:21 PM PDT by Lee N. Field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: alpha-8-25-02
It was in the year 251 that Baptist Churches declared nonfellowship with the irregular churches.

Where does this "history" come from?

82 posted on 06/04/2007 5:59:21 PM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
Where does this "history" come from?

Landmarkism.

83 posted on 06/04/2007 6:26:14 PM PDT by Lee N. Field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Lee N. Field
I notice they don't mention Munster.

English and American Baptists are not connected with the continental anabaptists of that era.
84 posted on 06/04/2007 7:04:31 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
Also, it looks like someone took 10 minutes to scratch this out on the back of an envelope. Isn’t there a better version?

Those kinds of charts were a staple of the old fundamentalist churches in the first half of the twentieth century.

Some of them are really awful. This one isn't very professional. Some are almost funny. They look, well, dated. I guess that's what people did before they had Powerpoint and a projector.
85 posted on 06/04/2007 7:07:46 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

If you want to be religious become Catholic.
If you want to follow Christ get out of all churches.


86 posted on 06/04/2007 7:18:22 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (here come I, gravitas in tow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet

Harold Camping, is that you?


87 posted on 06/04/2007 7:29:12 PM PDT by streetpreacher (What if you're wrong?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
No, but Mohammad claimed that the God who revealed the Qur’an to him was the God of Abraham. that Judaism and Christianity each gives a distorted view of Him. I don’t think any of this is true, but certainly that is the departure point of Islam.
88 posted on 06/04/2007 7:58:33 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

So much of Baptist doctrine is defined in terms of the rejection of Papal authority in the 16th Century that it is hard to say that Christian bodies of the first centuries can be called “Baptist”.


89 posted on 06/04/2007 8:51:14 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
So much of Baptist doctrine is defined in terms of the rejection of Papal authority in the 16th Century that it is hard to say that Christian bodies of the first centuries can be called “Baptist”.

Nonsense.

Scripture as final authority, believer's Baptism, equality of believer's, regenerate church membership and separation of church and state are all alien to the RCC. Churches of the first centuries that held these principles held beliefs that Baptists hold today.

It's interesting that no matter how hard the RCC tried to eliminate them there has always been a group of Christians that held these beliefs.

What was it Jesus said about being willing to suffer in his name?

90 posted on 06/05/2007 5:04:41 AM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; George W. Bush; alpha-8-25-02; Titanites
I think it may be impossible to prove a continuous Baptist Church per se.

Yes, I have to agree with wmfights. It is very near impossible to prove a continous Baptist Church. I think there is evidences to suggest that it was always out there but they just weren't very dilligent in recording things. When they did record things, they weren't very pretty. :O)

91 posted on 06/05/2007 6:13:39 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Titanites

I was a catholic before becoming a Southern Baptist. Do we need to go on with this? I’m ready, any time. I don’t agree with the catholics on anything, but I am willing to leave them alone.


92 posted on 06/05/2007 6:31:37 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Macoraba

Not quite the same, don’t you think? Not quite the same.


93 posted on 06/05/2007 6:33:16 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Titanites

I believe it is not in our best interest to encourage moslems in this country, when they have come here for the expressed purpose of killing all of us. Just my opinion. Fire away.


94 posted on 06/05/2007 6:35:06 AM PDT by twonie (Keep your guns - and stockpile ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

Fr. Meurer is only following in the steps of Koran-kissing Pope JPII.

Idolatrous heresies often find company amongst each other.


95 posted on 06/06/2007 7:39:49 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow (FR Member ItsOurTimeNow: Declared Anathema by the Council of Trent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SwordofTruth

>>Praying to Mary is not in the New Testament, it is totally invented by the Catholics. Baptizing infants is not in the New Testament, it was totally invented by the Catholics. The list goes on and on.<<

Amen!

Indulgences, purgatory, the Mass, prayers to dead people, prayers to relics and bones, men making other men “saints”, etc, etc. All invented, all keeping men blind to the truth.

catholic is to be spelled with a small “c”.


96 posted on 06/06/2007 7:44:35 PM PDT by ItsOurTimeNow (FR Member ItsOurTimeNow: Declared Anathema by the Council of Trent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson