Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS

I have no problem with the virgin birth, that’s quite scriptural. It’s the rest of the pagan substitution for Semiramis that is so depressing to observe in people that profess belief in my Lord.


528 posted on 06/03/2007 1:39:26 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
If you think that Mary was introduced as a substitute for “ the goddess,” or others in the 4th Century, then I suspect you are not familiar with the history of the period from 325 to 450 when the Church was wrestling with the doctrine of the Trinity. Harnack had it that Trinitarians both elevated Jesus to equality with the Father and Mary to the position occupied by the Arian Christ. I don’t agree with this, but the notion of Theotokos certainly came out of the theological controversies of the period. The term is translated by Jerome as Mater Dei, but it does not mean exactly that. It means that Mary was—as the Bible says—the Mother of the Lord Jesus, and the bearer of the Incarnate Word. As a Jewish woman, she is also the means by which Israel has accomplished its mission, which is to bring light to the nations.
529 posted on 06/03/2007 2:03:49 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson