Not a very efficient method of debate. In fact, it practically ends the debate before it's even begun.
The article that heads this thread is a terrific example of a man listing very specific points of departure he has with the RCC. Each point he supports with Scripture.
Unlike the thread about James White's sister, an RC convert who managed to say nothing specific in her entire discourse, but spent the bulk of her essay once again simply complaining "these guys are anti-Catholic."
And converts to Catholicism have done likewise in a number of cases. Salvation has a good list of them (that she may or may not have posted here on this thread).
Every one of this gentleman's complaints has been answered already; they are the same old tired arguments against the Church.