To: Petronski; Suzy Quzy; ears_to_hear; Dr. Eckleburg
It is true so far as this thread is concerned because no one is willing to contest the proposition that the bible does not even mention the assumption, immaculate conception, and coredemption of Mary.
180 posted on
06/01/2007 5:20:18 PM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: xzins
It is true so far as this thread is concerned . . . Because you said so. Right.
183 posted on
06/01/2007 5:21:08 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Keep your eye on www.fredthompson.com very soon.)
To: xzins
Because nobody here wishes to do it though the novel and narrow lens of Sola Scriptura, and I am no exception. Each of the three can be found in Scripture, but they are not blatantly obvious. If you honestly want to know, I suggest Scott Hahn's book Hail, Holy Queen. He explains it far better than I can, and it is worth noting that the Marian doctrines were his greatest hurdle during his conversion.
198 posted on
06/01/2007 5:30:45 PM PDT by
GCC Catholic
(Pray for your priests and seminarians...)
To: xzins
First of all, Co-Redemption is NOT Catholic Doctrine, so stop insinuating it is.
Second, if you had ANY discernment, why would you NOT believe that the Mother of God was conceived with NO sin on her soul? That is just elementary......why would GOD be born to a sinner?
Thirdly, why would Jesus want His Mother's body on earth? It's really no mystery that Jesus LOVED His mother. You dissing of her is Probably NOT pleasing to Him....just a guess since I assume you a lowly guy would want the same for your mother if you had the power.
216 posted on
06/01/2007 5:39:07 PM PDT by
Suzy Quzy
(Hillary '08...Her Phoniness is Genuine!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson