I am saying that it is obvious that this guy did not understand the Calvinist system he claims he was once a part of. In that sense I am saying that I think he is either a fictional person or he is not the person he claims he was.
He expresses a common misconception about Calvinism that only a non-Calvinist would have. No Calvinist and no former Calvinist would make that claim.
What are the specific misconceptions?