-The theology classes that Chris would have taken as a college freshman were quite Scriptural (and also quite Calvinist). I suspect the philosophy classes were as well. I know this because I took several of them (the ones that made up the required humanities core).
-Having met and spoken to both Chris and Dr. Hahn personally, there was a time in both of their lives that the last thing they would have wanted to have been labeled is "Catholic." As a matter of fact, Dr. Hahn quite freely admits that in his youth and college days, he was very anti-Catholic. If you have never done so, you should read Rome Sweet Home to get his own take on it.
I've also read that he continues to use some of your church documents as authorative which were proven years ago to be some of the documented forgeries of your church history.
Examples? Otherwise it's hearsay. Besides that, it doesn't detract from the fact that he does use Scripture a great deal.
Sure it does...Especially since scripture takes a back seat when it comes to the historical writings of your magisterium and your church fathers...
The theology classes that Chris would have taken as a college freshman were quite Scriptural (and also quite Calvinist). I suspect the philosophy classes were as well. I know this because I took several of them (the ones that made up the required humanities core).
And the Theology classes you took, did they not teach you from the bible that, " Salvation meant being made a son of God."
It's all over the bible...Why would a student of Christianity not know that???