[Risky-Riskerdo]

R-R, I'm quite willing not to ping you if you so request. But if you criticize Catholicism here, then I reserve the right to respond by pointing out how my question remains unanswered.

I get it, you will agree to the request, but not really because your fingers are crossed behind your back.

The question was answered, once again a personal dis-satisfaction with the answer does not negate the fact of it being answered. So, what is seems is that a fictitious liberty to harass, is reserved based on a purely subjective misinterpretation of the facts.

I have no problem at all debating the issues. However, I have serious doubts of particular posters to restrain themselves from making things personal, based on the performance of those who have exhibited a lack of restraint to make things personal, even after being advised by the Religion Mod to cease.

[adiaireton8]

You think you already answered my question. I pointed out (at least twice now) that you in fact answered a *different* question than the one I asked you. You answered the following question:

Whose interpretation of Scripture is not authoritative?

But what I originally asked you was:

Whose interpretation of Scripture is authoritative?

Do you see how those are two different questions? Just because you answered the first one (which I never asked you) does not mean that you answered the second one (which I did ask you).

-A8