Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Cur Deus Homo (Why God Became Man) is the first major theological work in the West that followed the Great Schism of 1054. This book is a major contribution to the theology of Atonement.

I plan to publish it for discussion in short installments as Catholic-Orthodox caucus threads. All Christians as well as non-Christians are very welcome, but I ask all to maintain the caucus discipline: no interconfessional attacks, no personal attacks, and no off-topic posts. Avoid mentioning confessions outside of the caucus for any reason.

Previous: Cur Deus Homo VI-VIII: Is God Omnipotent and Wise? (Cath-Orth caucus)

1 posted on 05/14/2007 3:42:08 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Andrew Byler; Blogger; Forest Keeper; Huber; jo kus; Kolokotronis; kosta50; Mad Dawg; NYer; ...
Write to me if you want in or out on this St. Anselm ping list.

The summary:

***

As Christ is sinless, the Father did not compel Him to die but rather, Christ wished to die on His own free will.

God did not, therefore, compel Christ to die; but he suffered death of his own will, not yielding up his life as an act of obedience, but on account of his obedience in maintaining holiness

As a figure of speech, it can be said that the Father moved Christ to His death, as the Father gave the Son the gift of obedience to the Father's will. However, the way in which the Father moved Christ did not overcome Christ's free will.

... in this drawing or impelling it is not to be understood that there is any constraint, but a free and grateful clinging to the holy will which has been given. If then it cannot be denied that the Father drew or moved the Son to death by giving him that will; who does not see that, in the same manner, he gave him commandment to endure death of his own accord and to take the cup, which he freely drank. And if it is right to say that the Son spared not himself, but gave himself for us of his own will, who will deny that it is right to say that the Father, of whom he had this will, did not spare him but gave him up for us, and desired his death? In this way, also, by following the will received from the Father invariably, and of his own accord, the Son became obedient to Him, even unto death; and learned obedience from the things which he suffered; that is, be learned how great was the work to be accomplished by obedience.

Now we understand how the will of the Father and of the Son interacted in the Incarnation and the Passion. In the next installment we will inquire into their necessity:

The question which still troubles us is, how the death of the Son can be proved reasonable and necessary.

2 posted on 05/14/2007 3:56:08 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annalex
Next installment: Cur Deus Homo XI-XIV: God's Honor, Compassion, and Justice (Cath-Orth caucus).
42 posted on 05/23/2007 12:32:00 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: annalex

keep alive


44 posted on 03/28/2016 8:14:46 PM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson