Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: rrc
ME: that whole paragraph is exactly what protestants dont want to hear, deny that is ever happened, and basically do the freep equivalent of holding their hands over their eyes, and going ‘nyaaaahhnnnyaaahhahahahah’.

On the contrary, I find Ms. Bonds conclusion exactly the opposite of what I found. St Patrick is an example of a person who fought against the Pelagius error, one that the Church has long since embraced even though they don't wish to admit it. Futhermore, you'll find in "the beautiful prayer of St. Patrick, "St. Patrick's Breast-Plate", no reference to the Virgin Mary. This, "Hail Mary full of grace" stuff, came long after he left the scene. Instead he states (in part):

Regrettably, St Patrick offers no mention of asking Mary to ask her Son to pray for him. Had Ms. Bond understood the ENTIRE history of the Church the outcome might have been different. Instead of relying upon fancy fables that were recorded hunderds of years after the fact, she might still be a Protestant today. However, IMO, the more Protestants do not read and understand the word of God, the closer they move to Rome.
49 posted on 05/07/2007 4:40:52 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson