NYer made two obvious errors in his post. The first was that Jesus kept silent before the High Priest. He didn't. Once he was ordered under oath, he gave an answer (As was required of him under Mosaic Law).
The second glaring error was his assertion that Mosaic Law prohibits a man from being compelled to testify. Leviticus 5:1 suggests otherwise and I can find no such prohibition in the Torah.
And then he used both of those errors as substantiation of how some Jewish Rabbi came to be a catholic. Well we have yet to hear from NYer on this subject. He has posted this RUMOR on several threads now. I'd just like to see someone substantiate it. Otherwise it remains a rumor.
"The second glaring error was his assertion that Mosaic Law prohibits a man from being compelled to testify. " to:
The second glaring error was his assertion that Mosaic Law prohibits a man from being compelled to testify against himself.
Again, professor, your argument is with Shoeman. Write to him.