She’s mentioned very few times in scripture and not as a substitute for her Son.
= = =
Ahhhhh, but the magicsterical has been feverishly busy for centuries correcting that ‘obvious error’ in Scripture.
Why, just as recently as . . . when . . . the last several decades anyway . . . added an additional cardinal doctrine or two—RE: Mary—to the ‘unchanging’ volumes of doctrine, faith, practice, ritual etc.
So, clearly, the magicsterical has had thousands of things to say about Mary to make-up for the ‘error’ in Scripture.
/s
I know; sad isn’t it that she gets so much and Jesus gets so little from SOME folks (not all, but some and more and more, it looks like to me). Sigh.