And here I thought he said, “I have yet to meet...”
Some things never change.
One of the most prominent and public members of his own denomination, R.C. Sproul, is very clearly and unabashedly a partial preterist.
So, you can argue all you want about technicalities...like the possibility that the author may not have actually personally met Dr. Sproul...but a comment such as this one by him seems to indicate he is either woefully misinformed or willfully ignorant.
Take your pick, x, but it does little to maintain your credibility when you resort to petty arguments in defense of a spurious statement in a hit piece you posted.
I have nothing personal against the author other than his misunderstanding and mischaracterization of partial preterism.