Are saying that Jesus made Mary the literal mother of someone that she wasn’t?
That’s what the verse says.
Ignoring for a moment the vitriol that appears to shine out of your prose, and going back to the Bible, what it is and how it was written and assembled, and understanding that it is an artifact produced by the Church of Christ, there has been here and on many other threads, the more than adequate Biblical justification of Catholic Marian thought.
I know, it’s hard to keep things straight when one’s beliefs and credos wobble around as theological fashions come and go. But it’s fascinating to watch. It sometimes gets wearying to watch the repeats of certain favourite heresies - and be able to trace their spontaneous eruptions through history, but that’s the way the heresy game seems to be played.
But to openly mock one of God’s gifts to us - one that certainly is Biblically justified, seems very odd.
No there certainly has not.
I know, it’s hard to keep things straight when one’s beliefs and credos wobble around as theological fashions come and go. But it’s fascinating to watch. It sometimes gets wearying to watch the repeats of certain favourite heresies
No kidding! I also notice a very distinct pattern in RC defense of Marianism. You are hitting all of the steps.
- and be able to trace their spontaneous eruptions through history, but that’s the way the heresy game seems to be played.
You should read the bible rather than the RC version of history.
But to openly mock one of God’s gifts to us - one that certainly is Biblically justified, seems very odd.
So are you accusing me of mocking Mary?